Still, the Sicilian is a combative opening that tends to lead to dynamic and sharp positions. Employed by masters and beginners alike, the Sicilian Defense is a reputable and positionally sound opening. (I use an old version of Fritz to create a CTG opening book from a clean database of games, and then ChessX reads that fine.The Sicilian Defense is the most popular response to White's 1.e4. But you're looking for a single all-in-one reference. And I create custom opening books per opening variation I'm studying. I use ChessX on a Mac, which supports all three opening book formats. There are three formats: Chessbase's CTG format, the open-source bin Book format, and Arena's own custom format. Once you have clean database, it's a case of creating an opening tree from that. you'd want something more future biased if you want to explore the Berlin or Catalan, while something more long-running for Queen's Gambit structures. Depends on which gives you a better set of games for your exploration, e.g. 1940 onwards so you start with the emergence of the Soviet School of chess, or perhaps from 1990 when computers were first used for helping grandmasters compete. Whether it's rating range, various historical milestones, e.g. Merge that into one big database, and run a deduplicate with a tool like pgn-extract.Īlso use pgn-extract to reduce the number of games to the subset you prefer. Grab the weekly updates from The Week In Chess to bring this up-to-date from millionbase's current 20 October 2020. Grab hold of millionbase 3.45 from - that's the historic games database with 3.45 million games Since it's just openings you care about, there are cheaper methods of doing this, for example: and you pay every year for the updated edition of the mega database, because that also gives you access to a year of weekly updates. With Chessbase you first have to pay for the software, then you pay again for the mega database. So the best opening explorer is one that's built on a game database that meets your quality criteria. It's a tradeoff of time and effort.Īn opening explorer is only as good as the underlying games database. I played Chess on and off for 10+ years but started taking Chess more seriously and need to play a solid repertoire for OTB Chess. Just wanted to add that I'm 2-2.1k rated online and do spend a lot of time prepping for tournaments. Chessable's opening explorer has significantly fewer games than the two mentioned above! What I want to know is just how big of an improvement Chessbase's database and search tools are or if there are any other that Redditors have to recommend. Then I hear some people recommending Chessbase and reading about how most top players use Chessbase.įinding courses on specific lines I'm exploring isn't always possible so I do have to do my own research at times but the limited search tools on and lichess's opening explorers seem incredibly unsatisfactory. allows me to search by player names so I can see what top players of an opening choose to play against their pet openings while Lichess lets me go through the explorer with custom timeframes. I use and lichess's opening explorers to find lines that seem worth playing but the searching functionality seems very limited and the games on the two platforms don't always have the same games which is weird, which can lead to different conclusions depending on which explorer I use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |